| |
|
Arm's Reach Co-Sleeper
|
|
Submit a Review
| 116 Hits
| Visit Website
|
|
Average Rating based on
12
Reviews
|
|
|
Overall Grade
|
 |
(7.83)
|
|
|
Compared to averages for similar items
|
|
|
Overall Grade
|
 |
(6.83)
|
|
|
|
|
Last Update:
October
8, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Displaying Reviews:
6 - 10
|
Pages 1 2 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Review ID: 1698)
|
|
1 of
2 people found the following review helpful:
|
| |
|
|
Expensive for what's really a very plain, yet over-engineered, bassinet; can live without, July 30, 2008
|
|
Reviewer: Anonymous
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
saw things this way
|
|
|
Overall Grade
|
 |
(2) |
|
|
Pros:
lots of color options; travels well; somewhat sturdier than other bassinets
Cons:
EXPENSIVE; scratchy sheets; thin hard mattress; so much fabric on this thing; warnings visible
|
|
I used an original, full-size co-sleeper as DD's crib for naps for the first 8 months of her life and as her primary crib for the next 7. She would sleep in it fine (after 8 months of co-sleeping in our bed), but only because I think she really did not want to sleep in our bed with us anymore (what a difference for all of us!!). Anyway, I didn't like the thing--too expensive (realized too late that a pack-n-play in bassinet mode is basically the same thing at a third of the price). The sheets are not of good quality--even the organic cotton ones are scratchy and wrinkle terribly. The mattress is less than one inch thick and feels like cheap foam. This thing is so over-engineered--there are straps and velcro and tabs all over the place. My husband is very handy at putting things together (architect) and he even said this was way over-done and difficult. There are safety warnings printed and sewn all over it also--very visible and ugly. Everyone who saw it always commented on all the warnings. There seem to be yards and yards of fabric draping over it that serve no purpose. All this and I STILL had to sit up to put DD back in her co-sleeper after nursing--so not even the original reason for having it after a C-section played out. Save your money and get a different type of bassinet or just get the in-bed co-sleeper "pad". We finally got a real crib 7 months ago and DD loves it--won't go near the co-sleeper when we tried to use it for travel. Arm's Reach Co-Sleeper is a truly useless product.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Review ID: 1243)
|
|
1 of
1 people found the following review helpful:
|
| |
|
|
Great!, March 20, 2007
|
|
Reviewer: juliegrant from New York, NY
|
|
|
|
juliegrant
saw things this way
|
|
|
Overall Grade
|
 |
(9) |
|
|
Pros:
Convenient
Cons:
not flush with bed
|
|
$129 at BabysRUs online (the cheapest I found). I love this item. It was inexpensive and will give us time to buy a crib. I had a C-section so I didn't want to have to get out of bed and walk to the baby's room every time I needed to nurse. My only complaint is that I thought the crib mattress would be flush with the bed (like the picture). But I guess, for safety reasons, you still have to reach down to pick up the baby. Other than that, it is great! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Review ID: 994)
|
|
1 of
1 people found the following review helpful:
|
| |
|
|
Love the sleigh style co-sleeper, August 20, 2006
|
|
Reviewer: Anonymous
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
saw things this way
|
|
|
Overall Grade
|
|
(9) |
|
|
Pros:
looks great, solidly made, fits perfectly next to our bed
Cons:
our large baby has outgrown it at almost 5 months
|
|
We have the sleigh style arms reach co-sleeper in cherry. It is really well made and looks beautiful. When we ordered it, we paid about $300 and we received it unassembled. It arrived just a few days after ordering it, and when we opened it, we found that one piece of the wood had a natural defect in the grain of the wood which could possibly cause it to split. I called the company and they immediately overnighted a new piece to us. I had a c-section so this was perfect to put next to our bed. It is not very big, so it does not take up too much room in our small bedroom. I am disappointed that our baby has out grown it. At almost 5 months, she only has a few inches above her head and below her feet . I will miss this bed! I highly recommend it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Review ID: 718)
|
|
3 of
4 people found the following review helpful:
|
| |
|
|
not worth it and poorly designed, February 28, 2006
|
|
Reviewer: amoncla from Northeastern NC
|
|
|
|
amoncla
saw things this way
|
|
|
Overall Grade
|
|
(2) |
|
|
Pros:
can't think of anything
Cons:
difficulty to assemble, cheap-feeling, hard mattress
|
|
I received this item as a gift from family before the birth of my first child in 2004. I was so looking forward to being able to safely cosleep. I imagined gently placing my full and sleepy/ing child into the ARCS with ease. Fast forward to reality.
The ARCS is a bear to assemble. The old pack-n-play my mother had is SOOO much easier to use I wish I had gotten one of those instead.
I found it pointless to have the thing attached to my bed as I had to sit up and place my child in it and they would ALWAYS wake up. The mattress is much harder than the firmest crib mattress. I ended up using the ARCS as a stand-alone bassinet until I could get a crib. I wish I had just gotten a crib and a pack-n-play from the get go.
The sheets are HORRIBLE. They are rough and shrink badly. Also they are expensive for what you get.
For my second child, I used an Amby hammock for the first few months, the the ARCS as a crappy bassinet and I am in the process of getting another crib since my first child is still using the first one.All in all, my husband and I really hate the thing and wish we had never gotten it. (Ours is the original, full-sized one.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Review ID: 962)
|
|
1 of
1 people found the following review helpful:
|
| |
|
|
Sturdy, nice appearance, convenient, August 13, 2006
|
|
Reviewer: dr-kat from New Orleans, LA
|
|
|
|
dr-kat
saw things this way
|
|
|
Overall Grade
|
|
(9) |
|
|
Pros:
Good-looking, indestructible, baby seems safe inside
Cons:
Very heavy, weird sheet size
|
|
I bought one of the wooden sleigh-bed co-sleepers in 2006. I was lucky enough to buy a "scratch and dent" model from the ArmsReach website for about $200 + shipping. Didn't get the color I wanted (cherry) but the natural wood color is fine. It was easy to assemble, no scratches or dents - it did have a couple of extra holes drilled in it underneath the mattress, which is why I guess it was discounted. Very solid - holds 500lbs according to the website. It has locking casters on all four wheels, I never locked them because it wasn't going anywhere! (It weighs 64 pounds) I also never hooked it to my bed, as others have said, you need to be able to push it away to get out of bed. I liked being able to reach over and pat the baby and reassure myself that he was breathing! ..without the dangers of co-sleeping in the bed. I had a c-section and I had difficulty lifting my 8 lb baby out of the co-sleeper, and often asked my husband to move him for me for nursing or cuddling. I like the rolling feature - I often move the crib from room to room for naptime, or just to get it out of my way. Looks great - solid hardwood construction. I couldn't find extra sheets in that size anywhere - happened across a spare on Ebay and bought that for $8 + shipping, ($15 each on Armsreach website). The sheets only come in white, the crib comes with one sheet and nice-looking white bumpers with yellow accent bows. The mattress is very very firm.
One side of the crib has a removable slat wall, there is a 3-4" lip around the mattress so I don't use the 4th wall much as my baby is still quite young and stays put.
Overall, I like the wooden bed very much, esp. the styling and quality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pages 1 2 3
|
|
|
|
Top of Page
|
|
|
